In the movie Before Midnight, the team of director Richard Linklater and actors Julie Delpy and Ethan Hawke set themselves the monumental task of portraying a single day in the life of a privileged Franco-American couple, while summarizing the last nine years of their relationship, and fall just short of creating a masterpiece.
Before Midnight is the third installment of a series that began with Before Sunrise (1995) and continued with Before Sunset (2004).
Each film portrays less than twenty-four hours in the lives of two characters, the French environmental activist Celine (Deply) and the American writer Jesse (Hawke), entirely through conversations.
All of the films are deeply committed to a realism that emphasizes the flow and rhythm of actual talk. So the movies allow Celine and Jesse’ words to jump wildly from point to point, and expose their characters’ thoughts and emotions in ways that are raw, immediate, sometimes uncensored, and sometimes painfully unflattering.
Which means the experience of the Before movies is much closer to the experience of living our lives than watching a typical movie, in which a controlling intelligence works hard to clean up the dialogue, make the characters look good (or chooses exactly how and how much they will look bad), and impose a structure on events that gives them an implicit sense of purpose and meaning.
These choices are particularly effective in Before Midnight because you no longer have the pleasure of watching Delpy and Hawke meeting or re-meeting cute, with an unknown happy future in front of them, but rather seeing them living the reality of that future in which their romance, their jobs, and the work of raising their children have become highly specific and in many ways, unsolvable problems.
Before Midnight is also powerful because the movies gets so deeply into the characters of Celine and Jesse that whether we as the audience like them or don’t like them, or whether Linklater-Delpy-Hawke care if we like them or not, is irrelevant.
The questions are whether Celine and Jesse can like themselves, or each other, or find a way to preserve the mystery of the love between them – now that the persuasion of its first blossoming is long past – or find happiness from lives in which it seems clear no transcendence will emerge.
Both Hawke and Delpy should get medals for acting courage in Before Midnight, but Deply in particular deserves praise. Her Celine is in a state of greater crisis than Jesse, and she holds nothing back. She looks and feels her age in a way women in movies rarely look or feel.
My only quibble is a technical one. Because Before Midnight has nine years to cover in the life of Celine and Jesse, it sometimes feels over-packed and over-busy.
For example, during a long argument in a hotel room, Celine brings up a whole basketful of problems she’s had with their relationship, and the realism of the conversation slips into the feeling that Linklater-Delpy-Hawke are trying to shove a summary of their last nine years into a single take.
An even bigger problem here is that they are asking us to believe that Celine kept many of these problems to herself all this time, and Celine is a character who the films have conclusively demonstrated keeps NOTHING to herself.
But these are small flaws compared to what the movie achieves. Few films hold a mirror up to its audience as relentlessly and unflinchingly and persuasively as Before Midnight. Go see it.
Other Massey Movie Reviews – kinda random as selections go, but what the hey
Much Ado About Nothing directed by Joss Whedon
Django Unchained directed by Quentin Tarantino
Sunset Boulevard directed by the great Billy Wilder
The Hunger Games directed by Gary Ross
This will be going to your spam folder but I do want to see this, along with the others. Should I do it from start to finish or can I go see this one?
I think you could see this one first … although I’m not very particular about seeing movies or reading books in order. (I’m a big Patrick O’Brian fan, but I jumped around all over the place reading his Aubrey-Maturin novels, for example.) The best plan might be to make sure you have ready access to film two, “Before Sunset”, so that if “Before Midnight” leaves you feeling a bit blue, you can go home, and see the younger Celine and Jesse at the moment where it all starts.
By the by, I read about the Branagh “Macbeth” in Manchester and thought of you. I thought, “Oh, wonder if Mrs. C has a plan to get tickets?”
Now, I do love to be thought about but alas, no tickets. Given my track record (THe Great Gatsby BALLET) I’d have probably gone on the wrong day anyway.
I think there is a BBC broadcast planned. I don’t know if there will be a delay seeing it for those of us in the States.
I will check it out.
Sounds fascinating – I’ll be looking out for it
I admit, I prefer the first two Before films. The open-ended romance of the first two films allowed me to imagine a happy ending, while with the third film in the instalment the reality of their relationship made me like the characters less.
I saw Celine as a woman who had become so bitter and angry; while for the most part, Jesse remained the same.
But I agree that the acting was superb and strong, and it was a good film. Just not always fun to watch.
I’ve always sorta liked them and sorta found them insufferable, so number three wasn’t that different from the other two for me. I’m just a little older than they are, with slightly older children, so much of what concerned Celine and Jesse was a good fit for me. I agree it wasn’t fun. For example, I kept thinking, I heard this argument was funny. It’s not really funny. But clearly, I was okay with that.