Billy Wilder is the greatest of all 20th century American film directors because he created masterpieces in two genres: the sublimely silly “Some Like It Hot” in comedy and the wrenching “Sunset Boulevard” in tragedy.
Now “Sunset Boulevard” is more often described as a combination of film noir and black comedy than a tragedy, with characters that shade toward caricature instead of complexity, and this is also true.
Both the deluded, forgotten silent-film star Norma Desmond, played by Gloria Swanson, and her creepy butler Max, played by Erich von Stroheim, sometimes behave as if they are in a horror movie. And the film’s main character, the thwarted writer turned boy-toy Joe Gillis, played by William Holden, narrates the story in a style that would make Sam Spade and Philip Marlowe smile with recognition.
But beneath the surface caricature of each of these characters are moving, complex human qualities that give “Sunset Boulevard” its force and its greatness. And the force of the movie begins with Norma Desmond.
Norma Desmond: A Woman Destroyed by Hollywood
Norma Desmond has been broken in that particular way Hollywood breaks people, by persuading them to trade their humanity for stardom. She was once worshipped by millions. As “Sunset Boulevard” opens, she has been forgotten for years and lives alone in a decaying mansion.
Norma Desmond has almost no identity left outside of her movies and the photographs of herself that are everywhere in her home. She is an example, as Cecile B. DeMille says in the film, of how “a dozen press agents working overtime can do terrible things to the human spirit.”
Norma seems incapable of forming a meaningful relationship with another human being, and almost hollowed out of humanity.
Almost, but not quite. Norma Desmond is imperious, deluded. She treats every interaction with another person as if it were a scene in a silent movie, with the grand exaggerated expressive gestures actresses used before sound came to film.
But Norma Desmond is still human enough to be desperately (even pathetically) lonely; still human enough in her despair to attempt suicide; still human enough to command the sympathy and devotion of the only two people who care about her at all: Joe Gillis and her butler, Max.
Max Von Mayerling: Sinister Servant, Selfless Friend
Max Von Mayerling may be the most intriguing character in “Sunset Boulevard” because, at first, he seems the most preposterous.
Wilder makes Max a horror movie sidekick, the “Igor” of “Sunset Boulevard” – going as far as to have him play Bach’s “Tocata and Fugue in D Minor” on the mansion’s organ . Wilder reinforces this idea by shooting Norma Desmond in a way that makes her look like the Bride of Frankenstein in several scenes.
Max becomes more preposterous when we learn his back story. He was the director who made Norma Desmond a star as a teenager and who became her first husband. He begged to return to her because life without her, as he tells Joe Gillis, was “unbearable”.
So by all the facts, we should see Max as a creepy stalker-ex-husband with twisted, selfish motives.
But I don’t think this true because I can’t answer one question: “What’s in it for Max?”
Max has turned himself into Norma Desmond’s servant and she treats him like one. He gets no affection or respect from her. Max works tirelessly to maintain Norma’s belief she is still a star. He delivers her every wish, including to help her trap Joe Gillis the way a spider traps a fly.
Max watches constantly over Norma to make sure she has neither the means nor opportunity to commit suicide. He has no visible life outside the mansion. If he is stealing Norma’s money, there isn’t a hint of it in the movie. If he gets pleasure from being mis-used, he never shows it.
The only explanation that makes sense to me is that Max Von Mayerling is in that empty mansion with Norma Desmond because he’s trying to help her, as best he can, and because there is no one else in the whole wide world who gives a two-cent damn about her. Until Joe Gillis comes along.
Joe Gillis is Not a Gigolo
This statement should be easy to refute. Norma Desmond is a rich once-beautiful woman of 50. Joe Gillis is a poor, handsome man of 27. Joe lives in Norma’s house, eats her food, drinks her champagne, wears the clothes she buys, and sports the jewelry she showers over him. And Joe has sex with Norma.
That, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, is proof Joe Gillis is a gigolo far beyond a reasonable doubt.
Except Joe Gillis is not a gigolo.
Joe Gillis is the main character in “Sunset Boulevard” and deserves to be because he is the movie’s most engaging and complicated person. Joe has been half-seduced by the promises of Hollywood – but only half.
He’s perfectly willing to sell his talent as a writer to earn a big paycheck. But Joe Gillis isn’t willing to sell his humanity, his essential decency, to live the Hollywood life. Joe is morally compromised. He isn’t, however, morally bankrupt.
This is demonstrated by all his interactions with Norma Desmond.
When Joe stumbles on Norma in her Hollywood palace, while trying to outrun the men who want to repossess his car, he doesn’t try to sweet-talk or seduce Norma. He makes fun of her.
It’s only when Norma mentions she’s written a movie about Salome that Joe sees an opportunity to take advantage of her. He offers to edit the screen play, for a fancy price, even though he doubts he can salvage anything good from Norma’s work.
Norma makes living in her mansion while he works a condition of the job, and with a few qualms, Joe makes himself comfortable, and manages (so he tells us) not to notice that Norma Desmond is trying to seduce him with fancy clothes, manly baubles, and a better room in her house.
Regardless, when Norma makes it clear that she wants Joe to be her lover – during a New Year’s Eve party at which he is the only guest – Joe rejects Norma and leaves. Then he calls Max from a friend’s apartment and asks him to pack up just his own old clothes and his typewriter.
Why would Joe Gillis leave with nothing, at the moment when he has snared Norma, at the moment of his triumph, if he were a gigolo? Why would he leave if what he wanted was to get Norma’s money?
During the phone call, Max tells Joe that Norma attempted suicide after he left the New Year’s Eve party. Joe rushes back to the house and refuses to leave until Norma promises not to try to kill herself again. Norma, distraught, says she will and Joe surrenders to her.
Like Max, Joe realizes Norma is alone and like Max, he can’t abandon her. Joe also sees the change in Norma his love causes. She becomes happy, even playful, and confident she can restart her career with her screenplay for Salome.
Everything slowly falls apart, of course. Joe can’t save Norma from the delusional and desperate belief that she’ll be a movie star again, and he can’t save Norma from her jealousy, and Joe can’t save Norma from his own unhappiness and self-disgust.
Again, he packs his old clothes and typewriter. He give her back her clothes and trinkets. He turns down her offer of money. And he leaves Norma’s mansion – or tries to leave, until Norma shoots him – with not a dollar more in his pocket than the day he meet her.
These are the human stories beneath the film noir and the black comedy, beneath the Hollywood stereotypes and the horror movie trappings. It is these human stories that make “Sunset Boulevard” superb. And it is the humanity beneath the caricatures that makes Norma’s madness, and Max’ failure to protect her, and Joe’s death, tragedies.
And I’ll go further and add an adjective to that noun: “Shakespearean”.
I love this film so much. It should be a genre – ‘Hollywood Gothic’. It’s a horror movie but there’s no redemption, no stopping the twin monsters of age and obscurity. Can you believe it didn’t win the Oscar for Best Picture?
Considering Dances with Wolves and Braveheart both won best pictures, maybe it’s best it didn’t!
The use of a dead man’s narration has always disturbed me. I am uncertain why. Does it amplify a certain melanchology up front or add a comedic quality or is it perhaps a sign of an ironic plotline? I would be interested to hear your view of the use of Joe’s voice and the effect on the story.
I always think of it, first, as an elegant solution to a technical problem. Wilder wanted Gillis to be his narrator but the story extends beyond his death. What to do? Narrate from the grave. (Wilder likes narrators in his movies: Fred MacMurray’s character in Double Indemnity also narrates, for example.) I’m sure Joe is more melancholy dead than alive. I don’t see the movie as ironic, at least not in the Generation X sense of irony, which is that you are ironic about everything so you don’t have to commit to an idea or a cause or a profession or an emotion. I suppose it is ironic in the more traditional sense: that what Hollywood promised, and what it delivered, are two different things. Joe is ironic about himself, I think because he feels more than he wants to feel. But he is never really ironic about Norma because he has too much sympathy for her. If he didn’t, he never would have stayed. On Joe’s voice, it sets the emotional tone and perspective of the movie. I might go as far to say it is the movie.
By the by, I hope the research trip to OK was okay.
Great insights. I was thinking of a more traditional interpretation of irony. You have encouraged me to think more deeply about this which actually relates to my dissertation in regards to good stotytelling. The irony for me lies perhaps in that a dead man is narrating in a voice that at once can be cynical and yet hints at an underlying spark of desire to maintain certain ethical values of character but all the while cannot realize a satisfactory degree of self actualization. Or has he in death indeed done so? Or is it all just ‘vanity and chasing after wind’? I appreciate as always your words and have been bragging about both your blog and your introductions which have led me to a wealth of resources in Oklahoma. Thank You!
I’m glad OK worked out. I said in my review about Joe that he is only “half seduced by Hollywood” and I think that is the key to him. He wants the Hollywood life. He wants the pool. He will sell his talent to get it. But he won’t … and we can take this literally, I think … sell his soul. Joe might call it his humanity.